CIA-trained remote viewers
repeatedly described target locations —
accurately — from thousands of miles away.

Hi, I’m Leslie McQuade.

When I was studying anthropology at university,
I kept hitting the same wall.

Culture after culture treated visions
as part of human experience.

Not fantasy.
Not superstition.
Real.

I didn't want to read about them.
I wanted to have visions.

Yet in academia there was an unspoken rule.
You could study them.
Document them.
Analyze them.

Just don't ask if they're real.

Meanwhile, the CIA was spending millions
investigating the same phenomenon
through Project Stargate.

If visions were nothing more than superstition,
why was the government studying them?

And if they were real,
why was nobody willing to answer the question
most people actually cared about?

Can ordinary people develop visionary ability?

That contradiction wouldn't leave me alone.
Traditional cultures claimed these abilities could be trained.
The methods weren't hidden.
Nobody asked if they worked.

One side had practices.
The other had research.
Neither had the answer.

So I stopped waiting for permission
from people who had already made up their minds.

I followed my own path
through traditions that cultivated visionary abilities
instead of just reading about them.

Yet one question never went away.

"If these abilities are real,
why do so many feel like they're still guessing?"

Then in 2017, something unexpected happened.
CIA FOIA requests.
Forced declassification.

Large portions of the Stargate
material were finally revealed.
For the first time,
the top secret CIA training protocols became public.

What I found in those documents
wasn't at all what I expected.

The surprise wasn't that visions existed.
The researchers weren't trying
to manufacture visionary ability.

They were learning how to detect it.

Embedded in those methods was a startling implication.
They weren't treating visionary ability as a rare gift.

They were treating it as a natural human capacity.

What if the problem was never a lack of ability?

What if it was a lack of recognition?

That’s when I saw it…
the problem hidden within the trance state itself.

You can train to have stronger,
clearer,
more vivid visions.

But that doesn't always mean more accurate.

Visionary experience?
It doesn’t fail outright.
Signal mixes with noise —
until you can’t always tell which is which.

You enter a vision.
Images appear.
Impressions arise.

Everything can feel completely real.
But what feels like signal could be noise.

Undetected, it can become so familiar,
you can no longer tell which is which.

Without independent verification,
nothing settles the question.

That’s the root problem
no one wants to say out loud:

"Every seer faces this.
Practicing a system alone,
without scientific guardrails,
can slowly turn perception
into delusion."

The danger isn’t having visions —
it’s mistaking noise for signal
until noise feels like perception.

Mystical and Magical traditions
warn of self-deception.

And the worst part?

You can’t completely rule out delusion
from within the experience.

And that leaves every seer
with a deeper question:

"Can I trust the vision…
my perception…
and my results?"

Not because nothing happens —
but because signal and noise
can arise in the same vision.

And experience alone
doesn’t necessarily tell you which was which.

It’s not about lacking ability.
It’s about training
to discriminate signal from noise
more accurately.

Which means even advanced Adepts
can wind up chasing shadows...
interpreting impressions
that may never have been valid.

Because without something
​​​​​​​outside the vision to check it against,
there’s only so much you can know for sure —
because you’re still inside the experience.

This is why validating what you perceive
is essential to every seer —
​​​​​​​from rank beginner to advanced Adept.

Mystical and magical traditions
have understood this problem for centuries.

Because they understand something
every seer must learn:

Discernment becomes more powerful
​​​​​​​when perception can be tested.

The Golden Dawn understood this.
It developed magical techniques for testing visions.

But the Stargate Protocols took another approach.
They applied the experimental method.

The kind where you attempt to see a target you don't know…
again and again…
until accuracy isn’t something you merely feel —
it’s something you can test.

And that adds something
entirely different to visionary practice.

You may already have techniques.
You may already have discernment.
Now you can put both to the test
under blind experimental conditions.

The Stargate Protocols make this possible.

You perceive the target without knowing what it is —
and record what you perceive,
Only then is the chosen site revealed.

You stop wondering.
And start measuring.

You compare your observations
with what the location actually was,
so now you have something outside
the vision to measure it against.

And as you repeat the experiment,
you begin learning which kinds of impressions
actually correspond to the target.

That’s why this is exceptional training for seers —
blind controls and target feedback
train you not only to perceive,
but to recognize which perceptions d
​​​​​​​eserve your confidence.
​​​​​​​
Now let me show you how
you can experience it for yourself.

 Introducing The Remote Viewing Laboratory™.

It takes visionary experience out of theory and puts it into proof.

This is not a course. It’s a hands-on Remote Viewing intensive —
designed to hone your skills.

It’s not just for Adepts and advanced seers.

Whether you’re exploring visions for the first time —
or already have years of magical practice behind you...

For four intensive weeks,
you’ll work directly with David Griffin and me,
live online —

while we oversee the Stargate Protocols
and help you make sense of your experience —
drawing on decades of our combined practice.

During these four weeks,
your visionary work becomes
David and my responsibility.

When you bring your results back to the Laboratory —

the hits,
the misses,
the questions,

we help you recognize patterns in your perceptions
you might otherwise miss.

So instead of discussing what Remote Viewing “should” produce…
you’ll have your own documented outcomes to examine.

You’ll learn to identify which
impressions correspond to the target,
which don’t,
and which kinds of impressions
repeatedly prove worth paying attention to.

That’s how you train signal recognition.

By the end,
you won’t just know more about Remote Viewing.
You’ll have honed your skills in it.

A four-week body of blind-target experiments —
so you can examine your results
instead of just believing in them.

No more relying only on how convincing a vision felt.

You’ll have a record.
A basis for comparison.

You either find the target or you don't.

And the skills you develop here
improve accuracy and discrimination
​​​​​​​in your Golden Dawn visionary work as well.

David and I will be your guides
live online each week
in a private working Laboratory.

Each gathering lasts approximately two hours.

All sessions are saved for replay.
So if you miss a meeting, you won’t fall behind.

We’ll schedule the weekly meeting time after enrollment closes,
so we can accommodate participants across time zones.

This is a month-long, intensive Laboratory,
not an ongoing membership.

Four live Lab sessions.
Daily “at home” Remote Viewing.
Weekly review and refinement with us.
That’s the whole structure.

Every gathering is not a lecture —
But a practical lab —
Where you run experiments,
examine your results with David and me,
get questions answered,
and use what we discover
to refine your next Remote Viewing experiment.

Or are you ready to put on a white coat
and enter the Laboratory with David and me?

Labs require more than courses or reading books.
You won’t be sitting around
listening to someone else teach.

Because once you’re our Remote Viewing Apprentice,
you’re not just observing.

You’re part of the Stargate Protocols.
Working directly with David and me.

Your work reviewed.
Patterns recognized.
Performance refined.

Until you can find targets reliably.

This is a closed practical Lab —
structured for direct supervision and active research,
not passive participation.

It wasn’t built for entertainment.
It was designed for precision.

That means you don’t wait
and hope you get it right.

You track execution.
You document accuracy and discrimination.
You recalibrate and repeat the Protocol.
We conclude by revealing the target for feedback.

When you enroll,
you’re not gambling on belief.

You’re stepping into four weeks
​​​​​​​of intensive visionary training
with David and me working with you every week,
reviewing your daily experiments,
so patterns in your hits and misses
don’t go unnoticed,
and what you discover
can refine your next attempt.

Have questions whether this Laboratory is right for you?
You are welcome to write to me directly before enrolling.

The investment in the four-week
Remote Viewing Laboratory is $399.

For the first time,
David and I are opening this Laboratory publicly.

Participation is limited to twelve
Remote Viewing Apprentices per instructor.

Once our working group is full,
enrollment closes —
because supervision and refinement
require attention, not scale.

The Remote Viewing Laboratory includes full access
to four supervised live sessions,
plus daily experiments,
weekly review,
and refinement
throughout the four weeks.

You show up.
You participate.
You get personally trained by David and me.

That’s the participation guarantee.

So if you’re ready to stop wondering
and start testing,
click the link below now…

We will see you inside the Laboratory —
as our Remote Viewing Apprentice!